One of the Clinton campaigns final arguement for going to the convention is that even pledged delegates can change their minds so no lead is insurmountable. Under the heading be careful what you wish for "Prince George's County Executive Jack B. Johnson, a Democratic convention delegate pledged to support Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, said yesterday that he thinks Sen. Barack Obama has "in a real sense" won the Democratic nomination and that he now plans to support Obama at the August convention"
I have mixed feelings about this. It does seem to come under the heading "Karmic retribution" But, even though I am an Obama supporter I do not think the the voters of Maryland that voted for Clinton should be disenfranchised in this manner.
A couple of things it does point out it that one, the feeling for Obama runs deep, especially with party regulars. Remember that the arguement had for the supers over turning the voters decision was that they had the good of the party at heart.
Secondly, how did the Clinton campaign let a man who supported Obama until Dec 2007, be one of their delegate. There was an earlier diary here chastising Obama for closing the selection of his delegates in California. This situation is the reason for his campaign doing that. You want the most loyal of the loyal as your pledged delegates.
Whatever your view, this is not the news that Hillary was hoping for to start this day.
|
|
|
Permalink :: 18 Comments :: Post a Comment
|
In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.
If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.